We don't talk about offsetting much. That's because historically it's been used to justify continued emissions, rather than following the science - and the necessary, though harder - path which requires deep emissions reductions and wide decarbonization.
Many companies are now using offsets of varying efficacy and quality as part of their climate and sustainability programs. While we applaud everyone who is doing this out of a genuine desire to tackle this systemic challenge, it's clear that the present approach is not fit-for-purpose. Unfortunately, while these offsets may have great co-benefits, it's highly likely they're not making a material impact on the amount of planet-heating greenhouse gas emissions that are out there, contributing to climate change. Read more: .
The science shows that deep decarbonization and emissions reduction is absolutely key - it's 90% of the work we collectively need to do. This is about stopping emitting new greenhouse gases (CO2 + others) from the present ~50 billion tonnes per year level.
At the same time we also need to scale up durable (i.e. permanent) carbon removal to billions of tons a year. This is both for the remaining 10% emissions for net zero and also sequestering some of what's already been released historically. Read more:
For companies working on net zero or other climate models, the permanence and additionality of the carbon credits they are buying is of increasing importance.
Transitioning Offsets to Carbon Removal
Companies play a huge role in combatting climate change. Shifting your offsetting program to include more durable and additional carbon removal solutions is essential.
Many companies are now using various forms of carbon credit to offset their company and supply chain emissions, or to making claims about their services. Read more: .
While we applaud this progress, it's not enough to making a meaningful contribution to solving climate change. It's certainly no way near enough to delay deep decarbonization of a businesses carbon and other greenhouse gas emitted from their operations. Read more: .
We believe now is the time to transition some - or an appropriate proportion - of company sustainability and climate budgets from traditional offsetting to durable carbon dixoide removal. We are not advocating all of the budgets move quickly away from other high quality projects that impact nature or humans positively, Read more: and .
What we are saying is that a core part of any credible company carbon reduction and removal program must include significant amounts of carbon removal. Ideally the highest permanence and additionality for the $/tonne available.
This is a mindset shift, here's why...
Carbon Removal isn't a tonne-for-tonne offset
Over the last twenty or so years, offsetting has grown in popularity - both as part of genuine efforts to make a positive impact and, in some cases, to attempt to justify claims about a company's environmental credentials. Read more: .
During this time most of the available carbon credits have been avoidance projects or nature-based solutions. Read more: .
These offsets have tended to be low cost - usually below $5 per tonne of carbon. Never more than a few tens of dollars per tonne.
It's been clear for quite some time that while some of these projects may have benefits and value we should absolutely invest in - including biodiversity or climate justice - it's not always possible to justify them in terms of carbon dioxide being captured and stored out of the atmosphere.
That, and $5/tonne is not a credible amount to pay to counterbalance a tonne of new emissions released. Genuine carbon dixoide removal (CDR) that collects and locks away CO2 so it can't contribute to the continued heating of the planet, is not going to cost so little.
The mindset shift we're seeing happening is that companies aiming to follow the science-backed path to combatting climate change means that the idea of offsetting company emissions tonne-for-tonne doesn't work out or add up. The cost of durable carbon removal is going to cost hundreds of dollars per tonne for a while yet, as the industry scales.
For these companies, carbon removal based on the permanence and additionality of how long the carbon has been sequestered becomes more important than exactly matching tonne-for-tonne. However, as these solutions are more expensive it's not always possible to use them to offset all company emissions they couldn't reduce tonne-for-tonne. Read more: .
We think that's ok.
Of course it means that claims of carbon neutrality need to be rethought, reconsidered and reframed to be more about the company's separate emissions reductions and carbon removal programs, in combination with increasing nuance on the projects they choose to support for their co-benefits rather than the carbon value.
We also like that this shift also further incentivises deep emissions reductions across the board. If you can't legitimately offset for a few dollars per tonne, and the alternative that works costs - at least - a multiple of that, in many scenarios the best course of action is to decarbonize.
In just a few short years we believe that this will become the norm. Acting now gets you in front of the competition as well as being the science-backed path forward. We talk more about this in our .
With this in mind we're asking all the companies we talk to three questions:
- what is the purpose of your offsetting program and how do you align it closer to the science?
- are the carbon credits you're buying to offset like-for-like, in terms of permanence and removal timeframe, with the emissions you want to compensate for?
- going forward, what proportion of your budgets can you allocate to carbon credits that are highly additional and remove carbon for hundreds to thousands of years?
Zopeful builds ready-made, high-quality portfolios of carbon removal to make researching, purchasing and managing durable carbon removal more accessible for consumers and companies.
Our goal is for higher permanence and additionality than traditional carbon credits, with 70% of our aiming to be durable storage of 500 years or more (this means the carbon is locked away and can't contribute to the continued heating of the planet).
It's critical to build this new industry to widen access, at an accessible $/tonne, to different types of permanent carbon removal solutions, as this is what the latest science shows us is crucial to scale alongside global decarbonization efforts.
Making the process of researching, purchasing, tracking and managing carbon removal credits easier is a key part of what we're doing to build trust, integrity and transparency in the voluntary carbon market as it scales up. To do this, we think a portfolio approach makes a lot of sense for organizations of any size (yes, as well as individuals wanting to contribute).
If you joined our CDR Portfolio Fund you'd be in great company with others from the US, UK, Australia, France, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Spain and Italy.
Have hope, make progress 💚
Looking to add CDR to your organizations' sustainability or net zero program? Perfect, we can help with custom volumes to suit your budget. Get in touch.
Add different types of carbon removal to your net zero program from our curated portfolio of high-quality CDR partners. Available per tonne per solution.
Ready to remove some or all of your carbon emissions? Amazing! You're in the right place. Subscribe to a monthly contribution to live your best climate life.
Bought a new thing or some more stuff? Taken an unexpected flight? You can remove individual purchases with our one-time carbon removal option.
Our ready-made, curated, portfolio of high quality carbon dioxide removal (CDR) solutions is live. It aims for the highest permanence-for-the-$-per-tonne that we can find.
We're excited to be working with an inspiring group of global CDR companies taking the fight to the Climate Crisis. They're doing amazing work that holds a tonne - pun intended - of promise.